During the run up to the last (2001)
general election, candidates in all three of the main parties
allowed themselves to be bullied by the Commission for Racial
Equality - an unelected minority pressure
group - into signing a "race pledge" which
committed them to refusing to discuss race and all connected
issues.
The effect of so doing was to virtually disqualify them
all from arguing with any real effect on behalf of their
constituents over many matters of grave concern.
Kenneth Clarke discovered this when the
Government announced their intention to convert an old RAF
base situated in his consistency, into an open camp in which
to concentrate up to 750 illegal immigrants. Just one of
the three proposed pilot concentration camps for illegal
immigrants which, if the experiment proves to be successful,
will be the vanguard for up to fourteen similar camps to
be situated in rural areas throughout the country.
Mr. Clarke's appalling abdication of
his duty to his constituents became starkly apparent to
them when he recently addressed a meeting attended by over
1,500 people, held recently in the market square of one
of the small towns that will be effected by the Governments
proposals.
Residents were told by Mr. Clarke that
he supported their opposition to the proposals and that
he would argue with the Home Office on their behalf. He
said that his objections would be based around the traffic
congestion that bringing the camp into use would create,
together with the very limited and poor road access to the
camp that was presently available. Mr. Clarke also stated
that he would argue that it was undesirable to suddenly
bring in upwards of 750 mainly young males into such a small
rural area, no matter where they all came from. Even if
they all came from Leeds, he said, he would still argue
against it and the matter was not one of race in any way.
Mr. Clarke did not explain what it was that he had against
the residents of Leeds.
It should be obvious to everyone and
certainly so to The Home Office, that Mr Clarke's objections
are baseless and bogus. Ex-RAF Newton was once operated
by more than eight hundred members of our armed forces.
The majority of these were unattached servicemen. No doubt
some of them even came from the Leeds area. It is well remembered
how businesses in the area were damaged when the base was
closed, local shops being the worst hit by the closure.
The access roads to the base and the
road system in general had no problems in coping with the
very busy traffic associated with the RAF base. Why on earth
should there be congestion problems now, just because of
a mere 750 illegal immigrants being encamped there?
The issue is Islam!
I believe that the real problem is clear
to everyone, including to Mr. Clarke. However the signing
of his pledge excludes him from being able to voice the
true and very serious reasons which his constituents have
for raising objections. Mr. Clarke was very careful to emphasise
that the problem was not one of race and he is entirely
correct in so doing. What then is the real problem? To parallel
the phrase used during Bill Clinton's first election campaign
of :"it's the economy stupid!" in this instance:
"Its Islam stupid!"
The vast majority of the inmates of the
proposed camp will be Islamic and their lives will be governed
by the Koran and the barbaric commands of their paedophile
prophet Mohammed. The Koran tells them, amongst many other
things, that a Muslim may not be killed if he kills a none
Muslim. That a tax must be imposed by them on Christians
and Jews alike, just how it is to be extracted is open to
interpretation. They are told not to befriend Christians
or Jews, so much for tolerance and respect. They have no
respect for their own women, let alone for ours, men are
given double the witness value of women in court. They are
told that men are superior to women. Stealing is to be punished
by hand amputation. Adultery is to be punished by public
flogging. Drinking is to be punished by 40 or 80 lashes.
Resisting Islam is to be punished by death by crucifixion
or the cutting off of the hands and feet.
It matters not to a young Islamic with
such a third world upbringing if people in the RAF Newton
area attend church or not, all will be regarded and treated
in accordance with the instructions in their holy book as
being either Christians or Jews.
Crime wave in Notts out of control
Crime, including begging, shop lifting,
street robbery, assault, rape and murder will rocket in
the area just as it has in other areas where illegal Muslim
immigrants have been accommodated. In the village of Sangatte
in France for instance, where the Red Cross house about
a thousand of these people, house prices have plummeted
as locals evacuate the entire area in a state of near panic.
Children as young as ten are being asked to perform sexual
acts for cash by asylum seekers living in Wolverhampton,
according to a local councillor.
The area around RAF Newton currently
has just one police station, which is only manned on a part
time basis. There appears to be no plans to increase the
police establishment of the area. Even as things are now,
Nottinghamshire police are being overwhelmed by crime. Robberies
have risen by a third, burglaries by 16% and vehicle crime
by 11%, all in just 12 months. Notts Constabulary have failed
to hit any of its crime reduction targets.The force had
pledged to cut crime by one per cent during 2001/02 - but
it rose by 14%. Detection rates and public satisfaction
with the force have also fallen. Councillor John Clarke,
chairman of Notts police authority, has been quoted as saying:
"It is unacceptable. Questions need to be asked. I
shall be asking the chief constable about these figures
and the Home Secretary will probably be doing the same."
It could not be clearer to anyone who
has been endowed with more than half a brain, that concentrating
some 750 illegal Islamic immigrants into an open camp in
any part of the county, at this present time, would be an
act of criminal insanity. The problem is that the Member
of Parliament for West Bridgford has disqualified himself
from being allowed to say so.
More at www.rafnewton.org
|