Lee Barnes, a columnist on the British National Party website, gives his view on The Race Murder Of Kriss Donald 15 BNP "Legal Eagle", Lee Barnes (LLB, Hons)

Daanish Zahid, 20, had pleaded not guilty to assaulting, abducting and murdering Kriss in March but was found guilty of the vile crime. Kriss Donald's burned and stabbed body was found on a walkway near the River Clyde in the east end of Glasgow.

Kriss had been stabbed thirteen times then set on fire. Whilst he was dying the lad had crawled fifty yards whilst on fire looking for someone to help him, but tragically no one was around to aid him as he lay dying in a park. Zahid admitted being one of the kidnappers in the car at the scene where the 15-year-old was killed but said he did not leave the car and blamed two others for Kriss's death.

The jury took two-and-a-quarter hours to find him guilty by unanimous verdict of the charges of racially-aggravated murder, abduction of a child and of attempting to defeat the ends of justice by destroying evidence by setting fire to the car the gang used to snatch Kriss.

He was also convicted of racially attacking Kriss's friend Jamie Wallace, 20, as the pair walked along Kenmure Street in the Pollokshields area of Glasgow. Both were targeted simply because they were white.

The car was then driven on a 200-mile long journey to Strathclyde Park, near Motherwell and then on to Dundee, before returning to Glasgow where Kriss was tortured and killed in what the prosecution described as a "callous execution".

He was beaten and tortured by the gang all the time he was held prisoner in the car.

Forensic evidence was given by the coroner which stated that the teenager was still alive when he had petrol poured on him and was set on fire.

His naked and burned body was found the following morning by a man who thought it was an animal carcass dumped in the park.

Hiding in Pakistan

International arrest warrants have been issued for three other people, two of whom were incriminated in court by Daanish Zahid. So far Jack Straw has refused permission for the lawyers to fly to Pakistan and arrest the other three suspects who are hiding in Pakistan.

The day that the verdict of this racist killing of a white child by a gang of adult Asians was announced in court the whole of the British media did not cover the story at all. Yet the very same day the 17th November 2004 the media coverage of the Zahed Mubarek Inquiry was at total media saturation point. It seems that for the media the racist murder of a young Asian lad at the hand of white psychopath is newsworthy but the racist murder of a 15 year old white child by a gang of Asians is meaningless. Although there was headline coverage in Scottish newspapers such as ·The Scotsman· and ·Daily Record·, not a single English daily paper covered the story.

This is not the first time the double standard on reporting race attacks on whites has happened.
The racist murders of young white lads Gavin Hopley and Ross Parker
were not covered on the BBC at all when the verdicts were announced in court.

Dangerous Game

The media in Britain are playing a very dangerous game with their coverage of racist murders of whites. When any ethnic minority (a term no longer acceptable in contemporary Britain as in many of our cities and towns indigenous whites are now the ethnic minority) in Britain is killed by a ' white ' then this racist murder is front page news for weeks. One has only to see the hysteria that surrounded the murder of Stephen Lawrence to see how the ' politics of racism ' dictate the media and governments response to any murder. No public inquiries have been set up to investigate any of the countless murders of white people by ethnic minorities in Britain at any time, nor have th media ever called for public inquiries. Whilst the political issue of so called ' Institutional Racism ' is never far from the front page of the papers the equally valid issue of ' State and Government culpability' in the murders of whites killed by immigrants allowed to enter and live in Britain is never addressed. This is the form of government ' Institutional Racism ' against white people that they do not want us to ever address or debate.

The murders of indigenous whites in Britain by immigrants allowed to settle in Britain without a democratic mandate via a referendum from the British people legitimising successive governments to allow them in, is the ' Institutional Racism ' that we, the indigenous British people have suffered at the hands of the corrupt British State for decades.

The murders of Kriss Donald and Ross Parker and others would not have happened if successive British governments had not allowed mass immigration into Britain for the last fifty years. This is the ' Institutional Racism ' that impacts upon the indigenous white community that is never recognised nor is ever the subject of any public inquiries.

Whilst the C.R.E and other race relations groups hunt down the endless fey phantoms of ' Institutional Racism ' against ethnic minorities , we the White indigenous folk of this land and the horrors we face at the hands of immigrants are ignored, vilified and forgotten.

The Politics of Pressure Groups

Whilst ethnic minorities and immigrants communities have endless pressure groups to represent their interests both politically and legally not a single pressure group, legal aided law firm or charity operates to represent the interest of the indigenous whites in Britain. Whilst immigrant groups, refugee charities and asylum seeker groups all get hundreds of millions of pounds of lottery cash and government grants to fund their legal cases and social outreach operations, not a single penny of government money goes in supporting the indigenous white folk communities of Britain. Whilst the ethnic minority pressure groups and ethnic minority communities have the right to organise in their communities socially and politically the only mainstream social and political organisation that represents the interests solely of the indigenous white British folk communities , the BNP , is banned by the government from joining the Civil Service and the police. This is ' Institutional Racism ' of the most pernicious and vile kind.

The principle of multi-culturalism means that all communities have the right to organise politically and socially as a community. By denying the indigenous white British communities the same rights as all other immigrant and ethnic communities then the British government and state are themselves guilty of ' Institutional Racism ' against the indigenous white communities of Britain. By denying us the same rights as immigrant communities then we are the primary victims of State Racism. Part of this policy of racism against the indigenous folk of Britain is also apparent in the media.

Institutional anti-white racism

The BBC, ITV, the newspapers and the media groups are all
' Institutionally Racist ' against the indigenous folk communities of Britain.

The whole structure of the British state is rotten to the core. It is built upon the pernicious fascistic principle that suppressing the rights of the indigenous people of Britain is fundamental to ensuring the rights of immigrant communities resident in Britain. Whilst the rights of the indigenous British people are usurped and repressed by the British State, the rights of immigrant communities are encouraged, funded and promoted by the British State. Whilst the media minimise racial attacks upon whites by ethnic groups, they use attacks by individual whites on ethnic minority individuals as propaganda to increase the perception that the whole white community are all potential ' racist attackers ' and that they can never be the victims of race related crimes.

On the 17th November 2004 this sick and evil ' double standard ' was painfully exposed for all the world to see. In Britain the politics of ' race ' is used by the political elite as the moral mechanism for the removal of the civil rights of the indigenous British people.

Our demands

We demand - but we know we wont get - an Public Inquiry into the murder of Kriss Donald to discover and address the following issues and why the Scottish Executive has rejected calls for an inquiry into the racially-motivated murder after Glasgow police abandoned an operation to tackle the problem of Asian street gangs last year .Operation Gadher, set up to tackle the growth of Asian gang culture in the South Side of Glasgow, was dropped at the end of last year because it was not deemed politically correct. The Scottish Executive is refusing to carry out an inquiry into policing there and a spokeswoman for the Executive has said : "We have no plans to conduct such an inquiry. However, how the police conduct the matter is down to them.";

A) How did the suspects in the murder of Kriss Donald leave Britain and flee to Pakistan without the airports being aware of them doing so?

B) How can so called ' British citizens ' use their dual nationality status as a mechanism for evading justice abroad?

C) Why do no laws cover the immediate return of wanted murderers by warrant that have fled to countries where British immigration officers are issuing dual nationality passports?

D) Why does the British government award dual nationality passports to individuals whose second nationality is in a country whose basic legal systems do not guarantee a system and procedure so that wanted criminals in Britain who have fled British jurisdiction can be returned to Britain?

E) How many other individuals have used this loophole in immigration law and nationality law to evade British justice and are currently residing in foreign countries?

F) Who in the government should have legal responsibility for allowing in immigrants into the country that then kill?

G) Why are immigrants resident in Britain with dual nationality status who commit crimes not deported to the home nations?

H) How many immigrants with dual nationality status have been convicted of crimes in Britain in the last fifty years?

I) How many immigrants let into Britain as asylum seekers etc have been convicted of murder in Britain over the last fifty years?

J) How many members of the immigrant communities have been convicted of racist crimes against indigenous whites in Britain in the last fifty years?

K) How many public inquiries have their been into racist murders of whites in Britain in the last fifty years?